Response #4; Dave Barry & Plagiarism

             I believe that plagiarism can mean different things to different people. For example a teach might see getting ideas from a friend on what to write in your paper or taking a new spin on a popular tile but I think that the thoughts and writings of other people being available on the internet is more beneficial than it is negative. I even looked in the comments of the post about plagiarism to open up to different ideas and opinions. When you are reading someone else's ideas you are taking a step into their mind and thinking process and it can enlighten you on a new way to think or give you a better understanding on an opposite view from your own. As for completely copying someone's thought process and taking credit for yourself, I believe that is unethical but I also think that the consequences for cheating are extreme. If someone chooses to cheat that should be on their own conscience, maybe give the paper an F and move on. For the mark to go on your transcript seems ridiculous to me, I do believe in the statement "A cheater is only cheating themselves" because someone else's actions are none of your concern.

"Today’s students stand at the crossroads of a new way of conceiving texts and the people who create them and who quote them"

This quote just makes the author sound bitter about the development of technology and the ease of the internet.

             As for Dave Barry's article on college, I could connect with the sarcastic and witty tone he used to describe the 'best four years of your life.' The summary's of different classes were actually funny and I could relate to them with just high school classes...

                              "Basically, you learn two kinds of things in college:
                               1. Things you will need to know in later life (two hours).                                2. Things you will not need to know in later life (1,998 hours)."

In the midst of college application week and the stress of senior year the light heartedness of the paper was a nice break to read something about college that doesn't weigh heavy on you or make a giant deal out of choosing a university, but, in a way making fun of the idea of college.

Book Response #3; Sell Out

                             

      

      I recently started a new book called 'Sell Out' by Ebony Joy Wilkens. The book starts out describing Natasha, "a dark skinned and big boned" freshman girl that lived in a majorly white community. Her family tries to shape themselves to the society around them and fit in with the white community by buying the newest Michael Kors purse and enrolling their daughter in ballet. Natasha's grandmother, Tilly, comes to visit and watch Natasha's last ballet recital. Tilly has the idea that African Americans and White people are two completely different species. She believes Natasha shouldn't be in ballet and living in a preppy town that 'didn't have enough jerk chicken.' This led me to the thought that the only real racist so far is Tilly herself. Natasha says "I was different from the other dancers... the girls never cared. They were my friends."

This picture shows segregation protests in the 

50s

      Natasha goes to Harlem with her grandmother and learns more about her self and her history as an African American. The title of the book now makes sense. "Sell Out", which to me means trying to be someone you are not. Tilly wants Natasha to 'act like an African American' instead of the white suburb neighbors she has. Which is like a large scale of segregation and seems to make White and Black people to different categories which I think is a completely stereotypical statement, no matter what color someone is, they should be able to act however they want.

The colored picture shows protest after the Ferguson shooting in 2014

These pictures represent that even after 60 years, there are still problems with the battle of racism. But could it also root from the African Americans themselves?

Book response #2

     The author of the book Don't Turn Around, is Michelle Gagnon. Gagnon is a fairly new novelist and has a reputation for crime fiction books. She has published multiple thrillers and murder mystery's ranging from college campus murder to abductions by Mexican drug cartels. Each of her stories, except for Don't Turn Around can be based off of terrifying true stories, and many of them are based off of corrupt government involvement. Gagnon caters her books towards young adults and more specifically- mystery enthusiasts, and her writing can most likely be compared to that of David Belbin and his trilogy; Point Crime.

        In Don't Turn Around, Michelle Gagnon uses 'text talk' and instant message font to keep the reader interested. Sometimes, it is hard to focus on the text when it is all one uniform type, filling page, after page. The im'ing and texts break up the story and give it a casual, more relatable feel, which I really like.  

      Don't Turn Around, is full of suspense and has a huge plot line, so it makes sense that it was split up into multiple books. There are 2 other books relating to 'Project PERSEF0NE', making for a trilogy. The book is still really interesting and shocking, and I think it takes a great writer to keep a reader on their toes up until the very end of the book. I look forward to reading the other two books in the trilogy and hope they are as enjoyable as this one was.

Book response

       In the beginning of Don't Turn Around, two characters are introduced; Noa and Peter. Noa wakes up and is in a strange warehouse with an incision on her chest, and she doesn't know how she got there, it tells the story of how she escapes. Meanwhile, Peter hacks into his dad's computer and finds a file labeled "Project Persephone." He tries to hack into the website but then something terrifying happens. "The  question was, could anything Bob was involved with possibly be worth the time commitment?   
Probably not, Peter decided. With a yawn, he powered down the laptop.
 A minute later, his front door was kicked in."

       Noa escapes the warehouse and makes her way back into her neighborhood in Boston, where she tries to piece together what happened. She gets an anonymous email with a coded message about meeting somewhere to discuss 'a paper'. Ironically the email is from Peter and the characters are apparently soon going to meet face to face.

      As the story goes on, Noa continues to run from the men dressed as security guards and finally rents an apartment for a night where she hacks into the same website Peter did, to see what she could find. The files end up being about her, like I had suspected.                                                                                                    The Sci-Fi aspect of the book makes it difficult to relate to the characters. Noa is fostered and Peter is ignored by his parents, so the characters themselves can connect. For someone who has lived their entire life with both parents in the picture I can't  relate to the 'abandoned' or 'independent' aspects of the book.

101 Things About Me

1.) I am terrified of heights and rollercoasters, although I force myself to ride them.


2.) Centipedes are the thing I hate most in this life.


3.) I've played every (female) sport except for softball.


4.) I love to travel, I'm going to Europe this coming spring break.


5.) My favorite color is turquoise, and it's the color of my bedroom.


6.) My best friend is Ellie Tate.


7.) I have to have a cup of tea every night before bed or I wont fall asleep.


8.) I am one of the most clumsy people I know.


9.) My favorite restaurant is Qdoba.


10.) I work at Chick-fil-A.


11.) I used to play the violin.


12.) I'd like to go to MSU for who knows what degree, next fall.


13.) I am a good reader, but a terrible writer


14.) I hate onions with a passion.


15.) I love my dogs more than anything